Training Secondary School Teachers in Instructional Language Modification Techniques to Support Adolescents With Language Impairment: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Overview of attention for article published in Language, Speech & Hearing Services in Schools, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#8 of 279)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
33 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
54 Mendeley
Title
Training Secondary School Teachers in Instructional Language Modification Techniques to Support Adolescents With Language Impairment: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Published in
Language, Speech & Hearing Services in Schools, January 2012
DOI 10.1044/0161-1461(2012/11-0066)
Pubmed ID
Authors

Julia Starling, Natalie Munro, Leanne Togher, Joanne Arciuli, Starling J, Munro N, Togher L, Arciuli J

Abstract

This study evaluated the efficacy of a collaborative intervention where a speech-language pathologist (SLP) trained mainstream secondary school teachers to make modifications to their oral and written instructional language. The trained teachers' uptake of techniques in their whole-class teaching practices and the impact this had on the language abilities of students with language impairment (LI) were evaluated.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 33 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 6%
Australia 1 2%
Unknown 50 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 22 41%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 13%
Other 6 11%
Student > Bachelor 5 9%
Researcher 4 7%
Other 10 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 22%
Linguistics 10 19%
Social Sciences 10 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 15%
Psychology 7 13%
Other 7 13%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 32. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 March 2017.
All research outputs
#230,735
of 7,442,076 outputs
Outputs from Language, Speech & Hearing Services in Schools
#8
of 279 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,407
of 143,282 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Language, Speech & Hearing Services in Schools
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 7,442,076 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 279 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 143,282 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them