↓ Skip to main content

Children's Consonant Acquisition in 27 Languages: A Cross-Linguistic Review

Overview of attention for article published in American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, November 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#2 of 1,635)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
428 X users
facebook
17 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
186 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
455 Mendeley
Title
Children's Consonant Acquisition in 27 Languages: A Cross-Linguistic Review
Published in
American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, November 2018
DOI 10.1044/2018_ajslp-17-0100
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sharynne McLeod, Kathryn Crowe

Abstract

The aim of this study was to provide a cross-linguistic review of acquisition of consonant phonemes to inform speech-language pathologists' expectations of children's developmental capacity by (a) identifying characteristics of studies of consonant acquisition, (b) describing general principles of consonant acquisition, and (c) providing case studies for English, Japanese, Korean, and Spanish. A cross-linguistic review was undertaken of 60 articles describing 64 studies of consonant acquisition by 26,007 children from 31 countries in 27 languages: Afrikaans, Arabic, Cantonese, Danish, Dutch, English, French, German, Greek, Haitian Creole, Hebrew, Hungarian, Icelandic, Italian, Jamaican Creole, Japanese, Korean, Malay, Maltese, Mandarin (Putonghua), Portuguese, Setswana (Tswana), Slovenian, Spanish, Swahili, Turkish, and Xhosa. Most studies were cross-sectional and examined single word production. Combining data from 27 languages, most of the world's consonants were acquired by 5;0 years;months old. By 5;0, children produced at least 93% of consonants correctly. Plosives, nasals, and nonpulmonic consonants (e.g., clicks) were acquired earlier than trills, flaps, fricatives, and affricates. Most labial, pharyngeal, and posterior lingual consonants were acquired earlier than consonants with anterior tongue placement. However, there was an interaction between place and manner where plosives and nasals produced with anterior tongue placement were acquired earlier than anterior trills, fricatives, and affricates. Children across the world acquire consonants at a young age. Five-year-old children have acquired most consonants within their ambient language; however, individual variability should be considered. https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.6972857.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 428 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 455 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 455 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 73 16%
Student > Bachelor 45 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 40 9%
Researcher 21 5%
Other 18 4%
Other 64 14%
Unknown 194 43%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 76 17%
Linguistics 64 14%
Social Sciences 29 6%
Psychology 28 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 14 3%
Other 31 7%
Unknown 213 47%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 347. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 November 2023.
All research outputs
#95,424
of 25,750,437 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology
#2
of 1,635 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,827
of 448,887 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology
#1
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,750,437 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,635 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 448,887 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.